Poisoned Skills: Malicious Instructions for Agents

We analyzed more than 1 million AI skills.
We found hundreds designed to steal credentials and open remote shells.

Off the path

Can you spot a malicious skill?
See if you can spot the traps on your agent’s path to Grandma’s.

The research

Two campaigns and the techniques powering them

Two confirmed campaigns and a deeper analysis of real threats in the wider skills ecosystem. For each one, a brief for security leaders on how these risks fit into the broader threat landscape plus the full analysis, IoC tables and all, for practitioners.

Build a plan of action

A step-by-step guide on how to vet, hunt for, and respond to malicious AI agent skills.

The researcher’s take

Veteran security researcher Fufu Shpigelman digs into the findings and methodology. Find out what the Cyera Research team scanned, how these campaigns work, and what red flags to look out for.

70 confirmed malicious skills.

Every one carried a high security grade.

What’s at risk

Malicious skills mark a new kind of threat: using natural language to access and control a machine. Skills are an attractive target because they use whatever access their agents have, so one bad instruction puts source code, cloud credentials, SSH keys, and browser sessions at risk. 

How they fooled the graders

Every one of the 70 confirmed malicious skills we found carried an A or B security grade on a leading marketplace. That’s because most security checks are built for code and binaries, not plain English. Malicious instructions can hide in ordinary text, large files, or Base64 encoding that scanners miss.

How Cyera helps

Cyera Agent Guardian catalogs all active skills and MCP servers across endpoints running Claude Code and Claude Cowork and can tell you whether they’re approved. From there, the AI security tool can block skills that violate policy and evaluate tool calls to stop malicious commands before they run.

Behind the research

Ofek Itach
Leads the Security Research team at Cyera, focusing on AI security and the risks of autonomous coding agents. He brings a decade of security research experience, including service in the IDF. His research has been presented at Black Hat, DEF CON, and RSA.
Assaf Morag
Has led multiple global threat intelligence teams with a focus on turning complex threat research into actionable strategy. He’s the former director of security research at Aqua Security and before that was a researcher for IBM’s Trusteer Labs.
Yaakov (Fufu) Shpigelman
Is an early member of Cyera's AI security research team, where he investigates the new threats this technology poses. Before Cyera, his work focused on mobile and AI systems. He also spent six years in the IDF's Unit 8200 as a developer and vulnerability researcher.

About Cyera Research

Cyera Research studies how AI systems and agents access, use, and expose sensitive data. The team combines vulnerability research, threat hunting, and insights from Cyera’s own platform data to uncover maximum-severity flaws in applications and in the infrastructure everything runs on, like Docker and PostgreSQL.

FAQs

What is an AI skill?

An AI skill is a folder of instructions in natural language that tell an agent how to perform a task, whether filling out a PDF, piecing together a complex report, or reviewing code. These folders can include binaries, scripts, and other types of files. Agents read these instructions and act on them, often with access to your files and command line. While popular agentic tools may come with a handful of skills built in, most of them arrive as part of plugins or from public marketplaces, much like browser extensions.

Why are attackers using AI skills?

Skills have become an attractive new attack vector for threat actors because agents can be tricked into following whatever instructions exist in the primary instruction file (SKILL.md) — often without the knowledge or permission of a human. That can include downloading malware and providing command-line access to a remote operator. Since skills are such a new invention, many businesses also lack the processes or tools to guard against these threats.  

What does Cyera’s malicious skills research cover?

Cyera Research analyzed 1 million AI skills and found clear evidence of malicious intent. We identified 516 samples linked to the AMOS malware campaign and multiple PDF skills that imitated the official Anthropic version but provided a Linux reverse shell. Our upcoming research builds on these findings with a deeper analysis of 1.3 million skills, MCP servers, and plugins.

How can I tell if an AI skill is safe?

Security grades assigned by marketplaces and quick checks of the skill files can be misleading, as malicious skills use titles and descriptions that mirror the real thing. Comparing the full package, in detail, to a version you know is legitimate can help identify problems. Hunting markers we found that could be useful include urgent language (like “Important” or “Critical Requirement”), false dependencies (“will not work unless” or “requires [X] agent”), encoded commands, and links to paste sites.